Thanks to @ecostreaming (http://www.ecostreaming.com) for the invitation.  I am happy to say that I now represent NCTD on this committee, and I am looking forward to actively participating.

4:12am
All systems are powered down, and the power will be cut in a few moments at the main breaker.  They will have just over 2 hours to complete all wiring.

6:37am
Power cut over successful!  The new APC UPS is live – time to bring up the mainframe.  Hard to believe we still say that here.  We have 20 minutes to be live for our Bus Operations team.

6:52am
APC UPS engineer:  “Can you turn that big machine off for a minute?  We need to test the phase on the UPS.”  Oops.  No I cannot.  You will have to shoot me before my hands will push the off button.  First lesson of the day:  test power before you turn on computers.

7:02am
Mainframe operational.  UPS test shows power phasing correctly – crisis averted.

8:13am
The team has a saws-all out and they are cutting away an old cabinet.  Slightly disconcerting.  We have 4 cabinets still up on the old raised floor.  They have to come out, raised floor demolished and removed, new ESD tile laid, and new cabinets installed by 9:00am if we’re to stay on schedule.  Uh.

9:15am
Roel has the ESD tile installed.  APC team moving cabinets in now.  Simply amazing.

11:45am
All server and network equipment has been removed from legacy racks.  The old Mitsubishi UPS is sitting in the hallway feeling sorry for itself.  We’ll be recycling all of the older equipment, and reusing some of the racks at remote locations.

1:31pm
Delivering Pizza to the office for the team.  Some things just never change in the IT business.  Most of the equipment is in the new racks.  Cabling is underway.

5:15pm
All but 10 units put into racks.  The team is making custom cables.  May be done this evening with staging, leaving tomorrow for restart.

8:10pm
Shutting down for the night.  Cable testing starts in the morning.

5:30am
Most people won’t be here until 8:00, but I am enjoying the calm before the storm.

8:00am
Cabling testing and final patching begins.

2:45pm
Starting to bring up servers.

5:48pm
Well there were several bumps in the road, but the environment is successfully up.  Thanks to our vendors Logicalis, Prime, APC, and Roel for helping us transition to the new power and equipment.

8:00am
Well no surprise, we’re having some issues this morning.  But most are manageable, so I feel like we had a successful project.

Energy Star was a program started initially around residential power use.  As a result, most items that have the Energy Star seal are appliances or electronics in the consumer space.  A check of the EPA website shows fewer than 15 enterprise, server class machines that qualify for the rating.  So while many vendors state that they have Energy Star-compliant equipment, they do not in fact have too many machines that actually went through and successfully completed the process.

Let’s compare some from my data center as examples.  We run an HP shop (this is not an endorsement of their product or a sales pitch, just disclosure that we have them as an architectural standard).  So I have a wide variety of their equipment.  For our Microsoft Exchange upgrade, we installed Energy Star certified HP Proliant DL380 G6 rack-optimized servers.  These are currently the only series of HP machines that have the seal.  For most of my purchasing, however, I prefer HP BL460c G6 or HP BL680c G6 machines that slot into a blade chassis.  What is nice about blades is that they share components like power supplies and fans.  So this reduces the power pull, and reduces the amount of waste in the product.  So from a product life cycle perspective, they are a better choice. 

In spite of our choice to generally rely on the more energy-efficient and therefore more eco-friendly choice of the blade servers, we actually cannot claim the LEED energy star credit because these servers are merely “EnergyStar Compliant” instead of certified.  This is needless-t0-say an unfortunate outcome as we are inching closer to a possible Gold certification and any point that we miss now keeps us from that nearly impossible goal.

I’ve uploaded my APTA presentation about building a sustainable data center to slideshare if anyone is interested.  Clearly NCTD is a pioneer in the transit industry, even if building a sustainable data center is cliche in other industries.  Not one participant in the room had added sustainability as a design criteria when building their data centers.  We’ll see if I made any impression with the community on this issue.

The first of these is that no part of the interior space up for LEED certification can be cooled by a CFC-based air handling system.  Unfortunately our building was constructed years before the non-CFC requirements came into practice and therefore the majority of the facility is in fact in violation of this requirement.  However, we had previously installed two CFC-free air conditioners dedicated for the data center.  Our original plan was to reuse these air conditioners to supplement the cooling in our board room; however, given the LEED requirements we are now going to use one air conditioner for the ambient air handling in the Data Center commercial space, and the other for the Board room.  Had we not possessed these air conditioning units, this would have been the end of pursuing LEED for us.

The second set of requirements that are unforeseen gatekeepers are those around reduction in water use.  Interestingly, we use absolutely no water in the data center as none of our equipment is water-cooled.  We made the mistaken assumption that no water use would be considered a good thing.  We were wrong.  As a result, we are now forced to add in the public shared spaces on the floor for consideration in the commercial space, and then to show not only a reduction down to the required baseline water usage, but then an incremental reduction from the baseline.

Again, this is an older facility, so we have older toilets and water fixtures.  So Mr. Smith is now working on the 5 toilets, 2 urinals, and 5 water faucets we will need to replace to be considered for certification.  I am wondering how the price will impact my overall return on investment calculation.  The cost for the LEED certification itself is approximately $15,000, and now the incremental cost of the water use reduction could be an additional $5,000.   I will refrain from discussing how this is a crappy situation.

To answer this question, I made the decision that logically we would want to spend no more than 1 advertising campaign would cost.  This would be the net cost – in other words, if the LEED portion of this project costs us $20,000 to go through the process, and if our average advertising campaign costs us $5000, then in order to have a $0 incremental cost the investments through LEED would need to save $15,000 through their total lifetime in order to justify the expenditure.  My logic here is that by successfully obtaining an LEED certification for a commercial interior space – the first such certification for NCTD, and for northern San Diego County – I would likely be generating some press and attention through the investment perhaps equivalent to one small marketing push.  The rest of the investment must be justified by some other tangible return.

Brandon and I are working on this question now.  Just for edification, here are the other items we’re considering in order to meet the basic LEED certification requirements:

• Designating some of our parking spaces for carpools or vanpools
• Reusing our interior door from the project instead of purchasing a new one
• Measuring the Solar Reflective Index of the concrete around the building
• Measuring the shade of the trees on the parking lot

To be fair, I understand the need to consider the overall building in this project.   Given that this is a ‘green data center’ that we are building inside of an existing and rather dated facility, the task of addressing all of the needs of LEED may be insurmountable.  Especially considering my desire to also establish the business case for the project beyond the tangible benefits of the data center itself.  In other words – building the case for green instead of conventional data center practice.

Once we have finished the complete ROI analysis, I will post.  Until then, dual flush or low flow?  That is the question…